Research press release


Nature Climate Change

Carbon dioxide removal not a substitute for reducing emissions


今回、Sabine Mathesiusたちは、コンピューターモデルを用いて二酸化炭素除去(CDR)が海洋環境に及ぼす影響のシミュレーションを行った。(現在の年間排出量のおよそ半分に相当する)年間最大5ギガトンの炭素の抽出を実施するかなり大規模な計画とそれよりもはるかに規模が大きいがおそらく実現不可能と思われる年間最大25ギガトンの炭素の抽出を実施する計画が検討対象となった。


同時に掲載されるRichard MatearとAndrew LentonのNews & Views記事では、「端的に言うと、いったん海洋に入り込んだ炭素を抽出するのは容易なことではない。そもそも炭素が[二酸化炭素として]排出されることを回避することの方がはるかに有効な対策なのである」と記されている。

Reversing ocean acidification caused by increased carbon dioxide emissions from human activities could take centuries, according to a study published online this week in Nature Climate Change. The study suggests even removal from the atmosphere of 2.5 times the current annual emissions of CO2 per year until 2700 would not re-establish preindustrial conditions or a low-emissions state.

Sabine Mathesius and colleagues used computer models to simulate the effects of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) on the marine environment. They considered both a substantial scheme involving the extraction of up to 5 gigatonnes of carbon per year (equivalent to about half of today’s annual emissions), and a much more aggressive and probably unfeasible intervention with a maximum extraction rate of 25 gigatonnes of carbon per year.

The authors find that only on the timescale of many human generations, perhaps even millennia, could even aggressive CDR undo the effects of high emissions under a ‘business as usual’ high emissions scenario. Meanwhile, the researchers point out, perturbations in acidity, temperature and oxygen availability would most likely put marine ecosystems and the species they support at untold risk. Mathesius and colleagues conclude that immediate and ambitious action to reduce CO2 emissions is the most reliable strategy for avoiding large-scale threats to marine ecosystems.

In an accompanying News & Views, Richard Matear and Andrew Lenton write, “Simply put, once the carbon has entered the ocean it cannot be easily extracted; avoiding the carbon emissions [as CO2] in the first place is a much more effective option.”

doi: 10.1038/nclimate2729

「Nature 関連誌注目のハイライト」は、ネイチャー広報部門が報道関係者向けに作成したリリースを翻訳したものです。より正確かつ詳細な情報が必要な場合には、必ず原著論文をご覧ください。

メールマガジンリストの「Nature 関連誌今週のハイライト」にチェックをいれていただきますと、毎週最新のNature 関連誌のハイライトを皆様にお届けいたします。