Research press release


Nature Neuroscience

The dangers of double dipping

機能的磁気共鳴画像法(fMRI)や脳の電気的活動を観測する研究によるデータの分析は、誤った結果を生じる場合がある、とNature Neuroscience(電子版)の論文で示唆されている。


N KriegeskorteとC Bakerは、人為的にある「ノイズ」データを作り出して分析を行い、実験上の変数とは無関係なデータにもかかわらず結果を得た。このことは多くの場合、分析によって本物の実験結果とは全く結びつかない偽の結果を生じるかもしれないことを示している。


Analyses of data from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and studies tracking electrical activity in the brain can generate misleading results, suggests an article online this week in Nature Neuroscience.

Techniques such as fMRI, which provides images of the brain, and electrophysiology, which record electrical activity from many neurons at once, generate a large amount of data. Some of this data is intrinsically 'noisy', being accompanied by other background activity, like listening to a radio station with poor signal quality. In order to enhance the signal of interest, the raw data is substantially analyzed, often using complex transformations.

Nikolaus Kriegeskorte and Chris Baker analysed some artificially generated 'noise' data, unrelated to experimental variables, but still obtained results This shows that in many cases, analysis can generate spurious results entirely unconnected with real experimental results.

These spurious results arise from a practice the authors call 'double dipping'. For example, scientists may hypothesize that a brain region responds more strongly to one particular stimulus compared to another. An incorrect, 'double dipping' analysis would look for areas that were more active with the original stimulus and selectively analyze only these areas to test the hypothesis. However, some areas may activate more to one stimulus than another purely by chance, and restricting further analysis only to these areas would yield a misleading result.

doi: 10.1038/nn.2303

「Nature 関連誌注目のハイライト」は、ネイチャー広報部門が報道関係者向けに作成したリリースを翻訳したものです。より正確かつ詳細な情報が必要な場合には、必ず原著論文をご覧ください。

メールマガジンリストの「Nature 関連誌今週のハイライト」にチェックをいれていただきますと、毎週最新のNature 関連誌のハイライトを皆様にお届けいたします。