Research press release


Nature Communications

Medical research: Lack of sex and gender variables in many COVID-19 clinical studies

米国の臨床試験登録サイトであるClinicalTrials.govに登録されている新型コロナウイルス感染症(COVID-19)の治療法を調べる臨床試験のうち、性別かジェンダー、もしくはその両方を分析変数として組み込む計画を明示的に報告したものは4%にすぎないことが明らかになった。この知見を報告する論文が、Nature Communications に掲載される。


今回、Sabine Oertelt-Prigioneたちの研究チームは、2020年1月1日~2021年1月26日にClinicalTrials.govに登録されたCOVID-19の臨床試験における性別とジェンダーの組み込みについて分析した。その結果、性別を一致させた試料もしくは代表試料、性別および/またはジェンダーを強調した結果の報告を計画していた研究が237件、性別および/またはジェンダーを分析変数として組み込むことを計画していた研究が178件、特定された。しかし、登録された4420件の臨床試験の過半数(2496件)は、試験登録時に性別やジェンダーに言及しておらず、935件では、参加者募集の文脈で性別やジェンダーに言及するのみだった。さらにCOVID-19に対する薬理学的介入に関する無作為化対照試験の結果を報告する論文45編のうち、性別ごとに細分類した試験結果、あるいはサブグループ解析の結果を報告したのは8編だけだった。


Only 4% of studies investigating therapeutic approaches for the treatment of COVID-19 registered on explicitly reported a plan to include sex and/or gender as an analytical variable, according to a paper published in Nature Communications.

Sex and gender differences impact the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 mortality. The inclusion of sex as a variable could aid in the identification of effective interventions and provide insights into COVID-19 pathology. Gender (a socially constructed variable that can describe identity, norms and relations between individuals) can affect access to testing, diagnosis, medical care and treatments and also influences the availability of social, economic and logistical support. Excluding sex differences in reporting results of clinical trials could lead to an increase in the risk of side effects for the excluded sex, while not addressing gender as a variable misses an opportunity to address healthcare inequality.

Sabine Oertelt-Prigione and colleagues analysed the inclusion of sex and gender in COVID-19 studies registered on (a US clinical trial registration site) between 01 January 2020 and 26 January 2021. The authors identified 237 studies that planned sex-matched or representative samples or emphasised sex and/or gender reporting, and 178 studies that reported a plan to include sex and/or gender as an analytical variable. However, out of the 4,420 studies registered, the majority (2,496 studies) did not refer to sex or gender in the registration of the trial, and 935 studies mentioned sex or gender solely in the context of recruitment. Furthermore, out of the 45 randomised control trial publications for pharmacological interventions for COVID-19, only 8 reported disaggregated results by sex or subgroup analyses.

The authors caveat that their findings only examine, which may affect the global applicability of their findings. They also state that sample sizes and disciplinary cultures may affect the inclusion of sex or gender within studies and that researchers may not have provided full information about sex and/or gender analyses when they registered their studies. However, they argue all researchers working in COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 research should implement a sex-specific methodology and more comprehensive analysis should address gender-related impacts and identify specific subgroup experiences and barriers to access.

doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24265-8


メールマガジンリストの「Nature 関連誌今週のハイライト」にチェックをいれていただきますと、毎週各ジャーナルからの最新の「注目のハイライト」をまとめて皆様にお届けいたします。