A simple traffic light classification system that can be used to indicate the probability of a subsequent larger event following an earthquake is reported this week in Nature. The approach may help with managing responses after an earthquake.
Large earthquakes are often followed by aftershocks that are difficult to predict and can sometimes be bigger than the original event. Currently, it is difficult to determine whether an earthquake was a foreshock of a larger event to come or was the main seismic event.
Laura Gulia and Stefan Wiemer analysed the average size distribution of aftershocks, termed the ‘b value’, following the 2016 Amatrice–Norcia earthquake sequence in Italy and the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence in Japan. In most aftershock sequences following an earthquake of magnitude 6 or more, the b value will increase, meaning that small earthquakes become more common relative to larger events. However, the authors identified that in the Italian and Japanese earthquakes, the b value decreased after the initial quake; in both cases an earthquake of larger magnitude followed, revealing that the first was a foreshock. They suggest here that the b value could act as an indicator that a larger earthquake will follow the initial earthquake. They propose a traffic light system to classify the threat of aftershocks in real time, based on the changes in the b value. They applied this system to 58 historical earthquake sequences that were greater than 6 in magnitude, and were able to predict whether a specific event was an aftershock or the main quake with an accuracy of 95%.
The authors highlight that more research and investment in seismic monitoring worldwide will be needed to understand the full implications of the study.
Evolution: A middle Pleistocene hominin molar from LaosNature Communications
Biotechnology: Contact lens measures pressure and delivers glaucoma drugNature Communications
Geoscience: Biological soil crusts reduce dust blowing in the windNature Geoscience
Space Biology: One small step towards plants on the MoonCommunications Biology