Features

doi:10.1038/nindia.2014.21 Published online 17 February 2014

India's biodiversity hotspots face climate change challenges

India's biodiversity hotspots are understudied and face stiff challenges in view of predicted climate change and increasing human disturbance, argue Vishwas Chitale and Mukund Dev Behera.

It has been more than a decade since Nature published the much cited 'Global Biodiversity Hotspots' article1. Yet there are no comprehensive studies particularly on the biodiversity hotspots of India: the Himalayas, Indo-Burma, Western Ghats and Sundaland. In the face of predicted climate change and the 'sixth major mass extinction'2, these eco-regions face new challenges of conservation and sustenance.

Majority of the 34 global biodiversity hotspots harbour exceptional concentrations of endemic species and are facing tremendous anthropogenic pressure. Conservation of endemic plants might also provide an umbrella for the protection of herbivorous insects, nematodes, fungi and large proportion of their parasites3. Nonetheless, the parts of four biodiversity hotspots in India are facing their own challenges.

The threats

The Western Ghats represent the largest chuck among India's biodiversity hotspots.
© Ganesh H Shankar/Alamy

Climate change and over increasing human disturbance are major causes for forest destruction and species extinction. Analysis of global human population data4  shows higher human population density in hotspots located in the tropics, where the Western Ghats accommodate the highest human population density among all global hotspots — more than 300 persons/km2.

The regional rate of climate warming in Himalaya has been observed to be higher than the global warming rates5. This could lead to extinction of native flora in the Himalayas because further pole-ward migration is not possible due to the topographic barriers. Most of the vegetation cover of Indo-Burma hotspot exhibits high levels of forest fragmentation6.

Recent extreme events such as the Indian Ocean tsunami have caused tremendous loss of forest cover in Andaman and Nicobar Islands, which form part of Indo-Burma and Sundaland hotspots7. Threats such as invasive alien species, forest fires, and droughts put undue stress on the vegetation of these hotspots.

Studying the hotspots

India's biodiversity hotspots cover a significant proportion (16.86%) of the total global area under biodiversity hotspots. Among the hotspots under India's political boundaries, the Western Ghats account for 64.95%, Indo-Burma 5.13%, Himalaya 44.37% and Sundaland 1.28%)8. However, the protected areas in most of them is less than 17%, which is minimal as per the Aichi targets of the Convention of Biological Diversity, 2010.

There have been no studies on accounting of the biological attributes, neither are there any estimates of the anthropogenic drivers of forest degradation in these hotspots. A few studies (except in the tiny islands of Sundaland) conducted at local scales in these hotspots were based on the estimates of diversity and endemism. Such studies suffer from the limitation of replicating and updating9.

Climate change induced species' shifts have been observed and predicted across the globe10. However, only some isolated studies have been attempted on India's flora11. In the face of global environmental change, there is need to identify the transition zones in the distribution of endemic plants due to climate change induced species' migration, which could be addressed by designing dynamic networks such as the 'Protected Areas Resilient to Climate Change' (PARCC) developed by UNEP12. Modelling species' migration under different climate scenarios and exploring the role of environmental heterogeneity on species richness and endemism may help to identify future spatial shifts of biodiversity hotspots13.

There has been some remote sensing-based vegetation cover mapping and monitoring in parts of these hotspots14. However, these estimates do not provide a broad view of the present status of vegetation cover of India's hotspots because of variations in the scale of study, data, method and the classification scheme.

The vegetation map of India15  presents precise and reliable assessment of the vegetation types in the country. However, it does not provide the latest estimates of forest cover in these hotspots. The estimates of forest cover published by Forest Survey of India in 2009 were criticized for being misleading16.

There is a need for remote sensing based vegetation characterisation of biodiversity hotspots in India, with a consistent spatio-temporal scale and vegetation classification. A comprehensive study could provide reliable, accurate and up-to-date estimates of biological attributes, vegetation types, diversity, endemism, anthropogenic disturbance, human population density and forest fragmentation.

It could also make bioclimatic predictions of climate change-induced species shifts, which could provide baseline data for effective conservation prioritization of the biodiversity hotspots in India.


References

  1. Myers, N. et al. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853-858 (2000) | Article | PubMed | ISI |
  2. Barnosky A. D. et al. Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature 471, 51-57 (2011) | Article | PubMed | ISI |
  3. Stork, N. E. & Habel, J. C. Can biodiversity hotspots protect more than tropical forest plants and vertebrates? J. Biogeogr. 41, 421-428 (2013)
  4. Cincotta, R. P. et al. Human population in the biodiversity hotspots. Nature 404, 990-992 (2000) | Article | PubMed | ISI |
  5. Chaudhary, P. & Bawa, K. S. Local perceptions of climate change validated by scientific evidence in the Himalayas. Biol. Lett. 7, 767-770 (2011)
  6. Roy, P. et al. Forest fragmentation in India. Current Science 15, 774-780 (2013)
  7. Porwal, M. C. et al. Impact of tsunami on the forest and biodiversity richness in Nicobar Islands (Andaman and Nicobar Islands), India. Biodivers. Conserv. 21, 1267-1287 (2012)
  8. Conservation International
  9. Joppa, L. N. et al. Achieving the convention on biological diversity’s goals for plant conservation. Science 341, 1100-1103 (2010)
  10. Loarie, S. R. et al. Climate change and the future of California's endemic flora. PLOS ONE e2502 (2008) doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0002502 | Article | PubMed |
  11. Chitale, V. S. & Behera, M. D. Can the distribution of sal (Shorea robusta Gaertn. f.) shift in the northeastern direction in India due to changing climate? Current Science 102, 1126-1135 (2012)
  12. Iverson, L. R. & McKenzie, D. Tree-species range shifts in a changing climate: detecting, modeling, assisting. Landscape Ecol. 28, 879-889 (2013)
  13. Chape, S. et al. The World's Protected Areas. Prepared by the UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, University of California Press. Berkeley, USA (2008)
  14. Singh, J. S. et al. Application of landscape ecology and remote sensing for assessment, monitoring and conservation of biodiversity. J. Ind. Soc. Remote Sensing 38, 365-385 (2010)
  15. Roy, P. S. et al. Biodiversity characterisation at landscape level: National assessment, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, Dehradun, India, ISBN 81-901418-8-0. pp.140 (2012)
  16. Puyravaud, J. P. et al. Cryptic destruction of India's native forests. Conserv. Lett. 3 390-394 (2010)